Mantic Games Dwarf Ironclad Regiment review

Mantic Games Dwarf Ironclad BoxDwarfs are the third range of miniatures from Mantic Games, and their first release is the Ironclad.

These are essentially classic Dwarf Infantry: heavily armoured; and armed with hammers and axes.

First impressions

On opening the Ironclad Regiment box the first thing that strikes you is how much you get for your money. Now, Mantic are well known for the value for money represented by their models, but they seem to be hitting new heights here.

There are four models sprues (three regular Ironclad troopers and one command sprue), two sprues of bases & a poster/guide in here, the box is literally crammed packed with dwarfen goodness. Check out the sprues below:

Ironclads Troop SprueIronclads Command SprueIronclads Bases Sprue

On closer inspection

Firstly, as with all Mantic’s plastics, the Dwarf Ironclads are a pleasure to work with due to their simplicity, you can put a unit together in no time, what’s more you don’t feel that the simplicity detracts from the quality of the models.

Mantic Games Dwarf Ironclad 3 part model
Dwarf Ironclad three-part model

To expand this, most come in 1 large piece comprising body, head, legs and one arm, these can then be customised with the addition of the a hand weapon & shield or a two-handed weapon. Mantic seem to be using a novel mix of techniques to introduce variety into units, rather than having the same pieces that are interchangeable on all models – some models have head swaps available,  some don’t, some models have swappable arms, other’s don’t and there are some models that come in just two pieces. Whether this mixture makes for more variety while maintaining simplicity I don’t know, but what I do know is that I like this approach.

There are a number of extras on each Ironclad troop sprue, you get a dwarf casualty, a tankard, a dwarf bulldog & an orc’s head (giving us all a preview about what the forthcoming Mantic Orcs will look like).

Onto the command sprue: the champion, banner bearer and musician are all nicely done, especially the banner bearer and champion. The champion in particular has substantially more customisation options than the rank and file, as it should be, making it easy to give each unit’s champion a unique look.

One thing that is slightly lacking though are weapons options. If you want to put together a unit equipped with hand weapons and shields you need to trim down some two-handed hammers to make hand weapons. This isn’t a huge issue but if you wish to equip a unit of 20 dwarfs with two-handed weapons you’d need to buy 2 Ironclad regiments as only 10 two-handed hammers are included. To my mind this is the biggest issue with the Ironclad sprues, it’s not the end of the world but it is slightly annoying.

Apart from this there was only really one other negative with this kit: the shields are slightly tricky to position on the arm. They are cast separate from most of the models, and on the unit that I built for the purpose of this review, I stuck them on so that they lay against the arm of each model, as you would imagine they would be used. This however means that the shield sticks out quite a lot and the unit doesn’t rank up very well. It won’t happen on my next unit (or your first hopefully if you’re reading this) and I can probably prise them off and reattach them at a better angle, once again just slightly annoying.

Mantic Games Dwarf Ironclad Unit
Dwarf Ironclad Unit – Champion facing side to aid ranking “Damn those pesky shields”

Anyway, I’m looking at a completed unit of Ironclads now and I have to say I’m impressed they really look the part of a unit of rock hard Dwarf infantry, fully armoured and ready for action…

…and at this point almost everyone out there is wondering if I’m going to mention Warhammer at all in this review, well I am actually, here we go. If you plan to use the Dwarf Ironclads as hammerers or dwarf warriors as part of an exisiting Warhammer dwarf army you are going to have problems, unless you give the unit the sobriquet “Lorin’s Long Shanks” or similar it might be hard to explain why they are a full head taller than every other dwarf on the battlefield.

That said, once Mantic have expanded their dwarfs range so that it is possible to field a full Mantic dwarf army there should be no such problems. As Games Workshops dwarfs are so short, Mantic Dwarfs are still shorter than human sized Games Workshop models and, as you would imagine, they shape up nicely against Mantics elves too,  see pic below:

Mantic Games Dwarf Ironclad Comparison
Dwarf Ironclad compared to other models, from left to right: Mantic Elf, Games Workshop Dwarf, Mantic Dwarf & Games Workshop Wood Elf.

Summary

So far the new Mantic Dwarfs have really impressed me; they look great and are a pleasure to build. There are some small issues with limited weapons options and getting units to rank depending on how you position shields but these don’t detract from the quality of these models.

Finally, as these are from Mantic, they are great value for money each model comes in at just £0.63 each.

So overall the Mantic Games Dwarf Ironclad Regiment gets a very respectable…

Overall score: 8/10

15 thoughts on “Mantic Games Dwarf Ironclad Regiment review

  • July 1, 2010 at 7:31 am
    Permalink

    There is a bit of a style difference between Mantic and GW dwarfs, it’s not as big as the difference between the elves, but they do have different head shapes (and knees). Do you think this is another reason why they may not fit into a GW army?

    I still think the skeletons are the best thing that they’ve done though 😛

    (though I’d have to say that).

  • July 1, 2010 at 10:03 am
    Permalink

    It is true that unlike GW dwarfs these guys have legs!!! This, as you suggest, another reason why they wouldn’t fit in a GW dwarf army.

    That said, I feel that Mantic may be sculpting their models to differentiate themselves from existing model ranges, this also benefits them in that if you opt for Mantic you may well feel compelled to build your whole army out of Mantic.

    I feel that the dwarfs and undead are on par with each other but only additional dwarf releases will back this up, the new Ironwatch look promising though…

  • Pingback:Mantic Games Dwarfs Ironguard review - Total Wargamer Blog

  • August 7, 2010 at 7:05 pm
    Permalink

    I really like the look of the Mantic Dwarfs. It’s an interesting point; – should dwarves have legs or not? – Of course in reality they do have legs it’s just whether or not you represent this in miniature form or not.
    Having said that I really like the Mantic Dwarfs, I also really like the GW Dwarf range too. I still have my – now redundant GW Warhammer 40,000 Squats Army and I often fantasise about the day that I eventually get arround to starting to collect that long delayed Warhammer Fantasy Dwarf Army to fight along side my Empire Army.
    It’s like the debate I have in my mind of which is more preferable: wheather the LORD OF THE RINGS Movie vision of a fantasy dwarf is more correct or if a more elongated looking dwarf character like that depcted in the much less successful DUNGEONS AND DRAGONS Movies; infact I’m not even sure that that is surposed to be a dwarf ? And then there’s the more true to life depiction given in WILLOW, but I think those characters are more Halfling like than Dwarfish but the little people of the world are the only real life Dwarfs in existance; so there you have it.

    • August 9, 2010 at 8:18 am
      Permalink

      Hello Adam

      I guess it is all down to personal taste at the end of the day but I know if I was a dwarf I rather go to war without loads of chainmail flapping around my ankles… 😉

      In this regard the Mantic dwarfs are more like LOTR dwarfs, i.e. less likely to trip up at an unopportune moment.

  • August 7, 2010 at 7:19 pm
    Permalink

    I’m not too sure about combining GW miniatures with models from another range like Ral Partha (if they even still exist as a miniatures company? it’s so long since I’ve seen them on sale anywhere). I remember that their ork miniatures were so totally different to GW orks that a unit composed of GW and Ral Partha Orks would look completely weird and wrong in a way. It’s kinda like combining GW Warhammer Orks with GW – LOTR orks; ( forgive me if the word ork is spelled differently in any of these different game systems or cases.
    I kinda miss the days when I was relatively new to the gaming world and before GW had become such a significant part of my life, but … by gone’s and that…….

  • Pingback:My first (Mantic) Dwarves… | Letters from Xanadu

  • Pingback:Mantic Dwarves: Talking about variety (pt. 2) | Letters from Xanadu

  • Pingback:Mantic Dwarves: Talking about variety (pt. 3) | The Letters from Xanadu

  • Pingback:My first (Mantic) Dwarves… | The Letters from Xanadu

  • Pingback:Mantic Dwarves: Talking about variety (pt. 2): what’s on the troops sprue | The Letters from Xanadu

  • Pingback:Abyssal Dwarves: Metal, metal, heavy metal… » ¡bitzkrieg!

  • Pingback:My first (Mantic) Dwarves… » ¡bitzkrieg!

  • Pingback:Mantic Dwarves: Talking about variety (pt. 2): what’s on the troops sprue » ¡bitzkrieg!

  • Pingback:Mantic Dwarves: Talking about variety (pt. 3): all hail the command sprue! » ¡bitzkrieg!

Comments are closed.